Fred Thompson once again keeps the blog alive with another insightful piece.
Patrick Emerson and I have
written about the Kicker and its folly often here at the Oregon Economics
Blog. In what is otherwise an arguably exemplary state and local tax system,
Oregon’s kicker is an embarrassment, or, more correctly, the legislature’s
unwillingness to deal with it is simply shameful.
As it happens the kicker isn’t entirely unique to Oregon. At
least six other states – Colorado, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina and Oklahoma – have “triggers” that automatically impose tax
cuts (i.e., give refunds, credits or a reduction in rates to taxpayers or
businesses) whenever cash inflows (real or expected) exceed planned outflows. Moreover,
Michigan’s Governor, Rick Snyder, recently signed a bill that will
automatically roll back personal income-tax rates whenever state revenue
exceeds 1.425 times the rate of inflation, although not until 2023.
All of these measures have a similar justification: the
widespread belief that governments are myopically imprudent, that when times
are flush they will spend like drunken sailors, thereby creating irresistible
pressures to raise taxes when times are tight to maintain otherwise unsustainable
current service levels. Moreover, automatic cuts are apparently politically
appealing. They promise tax cuts for voters, but grant them only when there is
enough cash to pay for the cut.
From this standpoint, Oregon’s kicker could be worse. It
goes into effect retrospectively, when actual cash inflows exceed the budget
forecast. In Oklahoma, the kicker is prospective, based on the revenue forecast
itself. This year Oklahomans, like Oregonians, will get a big refund.
Unfortunately, forecasts are not reality. Oklahoma’s actual revenues are insufficient
to cover both its budget and the automatic tax cut. Moreover, Oklahoma has a
very strict balanced-budget law. It must bring its cash outflows into line with
inflows during the current year and it is prohibited from borrowing (even from
itself) to do so. In this instance, the automatic trigger caused precisely the
problem it was supposed to fix.
Economies are
cyclical; revenues are too. That’s not necessarily a bug. The problem is
stabilizing spending, but, as the Legislative Task Force on Restructuring
Revenue and Governor Ted Kulongoski’s reset team recognized, the solution is
straightforward: avoid myopic imprudence, i.e., grow
spending at a sustainable rate, using saving and, when necessary,
borrowing, to smooth out spending. Were the legislature less pusillanimous,
repeal of the kicker law would allow this solution to be put into effect
without a foreseeable need for borrowing (actually, given my druthers, I would
base the revenue estimate on a sustainable, long-term growth rate, use the
kicker – revenues in excess of the estimate – to automatically pay down state
debt/build a sinking fund, and rely on borrowing whenever actual revenues dropped
below the revenue estimate, but that is a slightly different story).
It might be noted that
other states have found the political cojones to repeal automatic triggers.
According to Governing Magazine, the trigger
trend began in California, but was laid to rest during the Schwarzenegger
administration. More recently, thanks to their Governor Brown, California voted
Proposition 2 into law. Proposition 2 amends the California Constitution to
require that the Governor make mid-term spending and revenue targets part of
the state budget process, requires the state to set aside revenues each year –
for 15 years – to pay down specified state liabilities, and substantially
revises the rules governing the state’s rainy day fund. In other words,
California’s legislature did pretty much what Oregon’s has consistently refused
to do. They referred a measure aimed at making state and local spending
sustainable to the citizenry. On November 4, 2014, 70 percent of the electorate
voted in its favor. It is downright shocking when California exhibits greater
fiscal responsibility than Oregon.
1 comment:
The Tax Foundation of tax triggers (including the OR's kicker). http://taxfoundation.org/article/designing-tax-triggers-lessons-states?mc_cid=be351c2add&mc_eid=695bdd8064
Post a Comment