Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Good and Bad Oregon Economic News

Let's start with the bad: Oregon projected revenues are off by $35 million, or so says the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis.  This is no surprise and the state legislature has already been preparing for it.  Still, never good to have to do more cutting.

The good is that after a unsettling downward turn, the Oregon Index of Economic Indicators has turned back to positive. This suggests that Oregon is starting to recover albeit slowly and that this trend may be expected to continue with all the usual caveats: Europe, housing, oil, etc.

The OEA blog has a nice summary for the state of the state's revenues. Here is the picture worth a thousand words:

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Housing has Bottomed Out

Or so says Calculated Risk who has a couple of nice graphs to help make his point:



Both of these graphs suggest that we may have bottomed out on the construction side, but what about prices?  Here is CR again:

There are several reasons I think that house prices are close to a bottom. First prices are close to normal looking at the price-to-rent ratio and real prices (especially if prices fall another 4% to 5% NSA between the November Case-Shiller report and the March report). Second the large decline in listed inventory means less downward pressure on house prices, and third, I think that several policy initiatives will lessen the pressure from distressed sales (the probable mortgagesettlement, the HARP refinance program, and more).

Of course these are national price indexes and there will be significant variability across the country. Areas with a large backlog of distressed properties - especially some states with a judicial foreclosure process - will probably see further price declines.

And this doesn't mean prices will increase significantly any time soon. Usually towards the end of a housing bust, nominal prices mostly move sideways for a few years, and real prices (adjusted for inflation) could even decline for another 2 or 3 years.

I think he is essentially right. We do seem to have hit the bottom but there are a lot of factors that will keep a lid on prices for some time: unemployment, foreclosures, uncertainty, tight credit, etc. But I would not be surprised to see 2012 end with modest gains in average home values as measured by Case-Shiller. And I think Portland will be one of those areas in which we will see improvement by the end of the year.

I think the thaw has begun.

Monday, February 6, 2012

Picture of the Day: Reality Check

Yes the jobs report on Friday was very good, but here is your cold-water moment: things are still historically awful.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart by Amanda Cox/New York Times.

Horizontal axis shows months. Vertical axis shows the ratio of that month’s nonfarm payrolls to the nonfarm payrolls at the start of recession. Note: Because employment is a lagging indicator, the dates for these employment trends are not exactly synchronized with National Bureau of Economic Research’s official business cycle dates.

Friday, February 3, 2012

Good, Very Good: Almost 250,000 Jobs Added in January


The United States' unemployment rate fell to 8.3% in January, which is nice, but the real news is, of course, the jobs number and there the news was very encouraging - 243,000 jobs were added.  The BLS report also included upward revisions to the November and December numbers as well, adding another 60,000 jobs.  The private sector actually added 257,000 jobs in January but the public sector shed 14,000 jobs.

Last month I was sounding hopeful and got some blowback.  I remain hopeful that we are heading in the right direction and we are slowly, very slowly, gaining some momentum.  If we were able to sustain job numbers like these it would still take three years to get back to five percent unemployment.  But given how bad the economy got, given all of the 'overhang' of foreclosed houses keeping a lid on the housing market and given the banking cataclysm we went through, I think you have to be a realist and understand that it is not all going to get unwound in a few months and take comfort in the clear indication that the economy is now heading in the right direction.

Now let's all hope Europe can figure out its problems and we can all start rowing in the same direction.    

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Will Digital Subscriptions Save Newspapers?

Probably not for most.  On-line there is easy substitutability for new content and thus price competition soon erodes away any real profit - or so it appears.  But there are a few uniquely situated news organizations that provide something a bit different: a broad range of coverage, in-depth reporting, a national and even global reach and the reputation for quality.  The New York Times is one such organization and over a year ago they decided to stop offering their content for free and start digital subscriptions.  The results, while not providing any comfort to smaller, regional papers, are encouraging for the Gray Lady.

Here is the blog Newsonomics dissecting the numbers and extrapolating their impact on the bottom line:
The numbers in brief, from this morning’s Times 2011 earnings report:

  • 390,000 digital subscribers overall.
  • Growth rate of 20% fourth quarter over third quarter. 
Those are the public numbers. We’re left to extrapolate the dollars. My extrapolation is that the run-rate for the Times’ new digital revenue is about $86 million a year.

He then goes on to discuss some other interesting numbers:

In talking with Paul Smurl, VP of paid products for the Times, this week, I picked up some related datapoints that help us understand what this first year may lead to:


  • 70%+ % of the Times’ print subscribers have now “authenticated.”
  • Churn is less with digital than print customers: Skeptics opined that people might sign up, but then flee after sampling the paid digital product. The opposite appears true: Smurl says digital churn is less than print churn.
  • About 12% of digital buyers live outside the U.S.: That’s a growing number. It’s an indication that the Times is becoming a global news medium.

And my favorite (because it describes me):

Exploiting Sunday: It took about 12 seconds for Times’ readers to figure out the new subscription math, when the company when digital-paid last year. When they did the math and saw they could get the four-pound Sunday paper and “all-digital-access” for $60 less than “all-digital-access” by itself, they took the newsprint. Which stabilized Sunday sales, and the Sunday ad base.

The problem with local paper like The Oregonian who would like to follow this model is that they don't have a suitably differentiated product - there is just too much competition. The problem for consumers is that it is too hard to judge quality past a certain point - what stories are being missed, what stories are not explored deeply enough, and so on? When such information asymmetries exist in markets the result is well known: all the high quality stuff goes away.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Bike-o-nomics: Bike Boxes


From the Oregonian's Joseph Rose's Twitter feed (@pdxcommute) I was alerted to this interesting missive about bike boxes from England.  It starts with a brief description of a truck (lorry) on bike accident that is all too fmiliar: a biker in the bike lane going straight and a truck in front slowing to turn right (or in this case left as the Brits are all crazy and drive on the wrong side of the road). Here is a quote from the London Evening Standard:
Mr Moore had been riding on a cycle lane on the inside of queueing traffic and drew level with the tanker’s front axle virtually as it began pulling away. He tried to cycle straight on but was hit by the lorry - which had stopped in the advance cyclist’s “box” - as it turned.

PC Austin said the Highway Code made clear that Mr Moore had the right of way. “Had he [the driver] looked in his mirrors as Mr Moore cycled up, it’s very clear he would have been visible. He is utilising the cycle lane as is right and just.”

But under cross examination from Mr Gummer’s barrister Alexis Dite, PC Austin admitted: “It would have been a pertinent move, as a cyclist coming down the inside of a large goods vehicle, to show some level of caution.”

… Mr Gummer, who has more than 30 years’ experience as a HGV driver and a clean licence, was found not guilty of careless driving after insisting he had checked his mirrors before pulling away. The CCTV images showed he was indicating left as he waited at the lights.

The author of the blog argues that bike boxes are ineffective because the reality on England's small urban streets is that congestion effectively causes them to be ignored.  Though I am not sure that in the case above the bike box matters at all as the light had already changes and the lorry had commenced its left turn - so the queuing purpose of the box was obviated.  The author then goes on to argue that more needs to be don to protect bikers and mentions a Dutch solution:



This seems a pretty good solution but it still has a flaw - the cyclists themselves.  Which is what concerns me about all the efforts to provide more safety for bikes.  Bike boxes, green painted lanes, additional signage can give a false sense of security to bikes.  As in the above incident, a prudent biker would not assume the truck can see them and would slow down.  Cars do this all the time, it is a basic principle of defensive driving: never assume the other cars see you, anticipate you, etc.  In economics terms these lower the perceived cost of asserting ones rights as a biker more than the lower the actual cost.  It is a false sense of security.

In the case above, bikers would still face a similar problem, if they come up upon a right turning car from behind, the car has to identify them and bikers should never assume this is the case.  Also, bikers wishing to turn left have to wait for the next light change - an extra level of patience often not found in urban cyclists.

Which is all to say that I don't understand why we expect engineering to solve all of these problems.  I believe in infrastructure dedicated to bikes but, as in so many other aspects of life, education and public awareness might yield a higher marginal return on the same money spent.  I would guess that almost all drivers and cyclists would fail a test on the basics of the Oregon code that governs bikes in roadways, for example.  We make drivers learn and pass a test before setting them free, but do nothing similar for bikers nor stress the biker-car interface in the Oregon driving manual or test.  Doing something as including bikes in the Oregon drivers test and a public awareness campaign about defensive biking and good biking behavior might do a lot more than gallons of green paint.  

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Oregon's Budget Shortfall, Part...what...26?

OPB has the story this morning of the Oregon Legislature first officially mandated annual session where the first order of business will likely be yet another round of cuts coming from revenues that have not kept up with last years projections.

Which got me to thinking, two years ago voters in Oregon approved a measure that included a temporary tax increase to 10.8 on individual income above $125,000 and 11% on income above $250,000.  Those increases were to both roll back to a new permanent 9.9% bracket on anything above $125,000 in 2012.  This means that the part of the state's revenue shortfall is coming from the tax roll-back.

Michelle Cole of The Oregonian had this story last month (which I missed at the time):

The drop in the tax rates for an estimated 35,000 high-income households is part of a controversial policy passed by the Legislature and approved by voters in the 2010 election. At the time, everyone agreed that the 10.8 and 11 percent income tax rates contained in Measure 66 would only be a temporary solution to help balance the state budget.

On Jan. 1, the tax rate drops to 9.9 percent for individuals who earn more than $125,000 or joint filers with incomes in excess of $250,000. That top rate is still higher than the 9 percent it was before Measure 66. But the change means state government is projected to receive about $118 million less during the current, two-year budget period.

So there is the answer I was looking for: the tax roll-back will cost the state about $118 million in revenue. Which, in a sense, is neither here nor there - the budget projections last year included this as it was anticipated and still lawmakers are anticipating a $50 to $80 million dollar shortfall.

But perhaps this will provide I little stimulus? Sadly I suspect that it will provide almost none, for the difference between this and, say, a payroll tax cut is the fact that the marginal propensity to consume from this income is very low. We would not expect this extra money to be spend, but rather saved or invested - neither of which is a big help at a time when capital is not being used for investment because of the lack of aggregate demand not because there is no cash around.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Picture of the Day: Growth Private and Public

Via The New York Times' Economix blog, this graph comparing private sector growth and public sector growth:

Quarterly change at seasonally adjusted annual rate.
Source: NYTimes. Data source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

You can have your own correlation and causation debate here: shrinking government  returned the private sector to growth or held overall growth down hurting the private sector.  I am in the latter camp: in a time of recession the severe austerity imposed at the state and local levels have had a big role in suppressing growth.

Update: Here is Krugman posting on the same thing.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Recovery?

Yet another sign today that the US may be on the road to recovery: the US grew at an annualized rate of 2.8% last quarter.  This is good news considering where we have been these last few years, but not good enough to may anyone feel good about the staying power of such a trend.  And the trend itself isn't good enough: at a 2.8% rate we'll be lucky to keep up with jab market growth - so we won't be making any real progress on unemployment.  But if this presages a more robust recovery, and if Europe doesn't slide into serious recession and drag us down with it, then it is good news.

As you can tell, all of the qualifiers are the problem.  But it is much better to be fretting over whether this positive momentum can be maintained and accelerated than wondering when the economy will hit bottom. Unlike recovery of years past, this does not look like one that will have a sharp and rapid recovery.  Just about everyone, myself included, think it is going to take a very long time.

One interesting aspect of the current growth is that businesses have become a little more bullish on the future, building up inventories, but consumers are not keeping pace.  There is a concern that unless consumers jump back into the market, the whole thing will sputter.  From The New York Times:

Growth in the fourth quarter ... was driven mostly by companies rebuilding their stockroom inventories, and not by consumers who were shopping more or foreign businesses buying more American-made products. And companies are likely to have only so much appetite for refilling their backroom shelves if consumers are still unwilling to buy those products.

Consumer spending rose at an annual pace of 2 percent, slightly better than the 1.7 percent in the previous quarter, Friday’s report showed. But based on early data, it looks as if consumer spending deteriorated toward the end of the year. This may be because of unseasonably warm December weather, which probably lowered families’ household electricity and gas bills, said Jay Feldman, an economist at Credit Suisse.

But the investment in inventories should help incomes and employment which, in turn, should help spur more consumption - so there is reason for some optimism there. And there is evidence that both orders for durable goods are up, and that credit for small business is easing, as the general level of confidence in the recovery grows. But then there is the old bugaboo of sharp cuts in government spending:

One of the biggest drags on growth in the last quarter was government spending cuts at the federal, state and local levels, according to the Commerce Department report. National defense spending fell a whopping 12.5 percent, for example, an unusually large dip that economists do not expect to see repeated in the beginning of 2012. Strapped state and local governments are likely to continue cutting back in 2012, as they have done nearly every quarter for the last several years.

So as long as state and local governments are still cutting and Europe is still dealing with a potentially debilitating crisis, we are unlikely to see really strong growth. I guess we'll have to be satisfied with what we can get in the interim.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Oregon's Timber Economy

Over at the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis, Josh Lehner has done yet another fascinating post, this time on Oregon's wood product industry.  Go there and read the entire thing, its worth your time, but I'll whet your appetite with two graphs.

The first is a look at the historical employment in the wood products industry in Oregon:


And the second is wood products as a percentage of oregon GDP:


As you can clearly see from these graphs, Oregon just isn't a timber driven state anymore.  What is remarkable to me is how relatively steady was the timber-based employment in the state until about 1990.  It falls off a bit earlier in terms of state GDP but that includes both the fall off of timber-based income and the growth of a more diverse economy.

There is much more in Josh's post, including timber payments to rural counties and the overall timber harvest, but these two graphs would be in chapter 1 of the book on the economic history of Oregon.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Oregon Ranked #13th Best in Business Tax Climate

The Tax Foundation has released its latest Business Tax Climate rankings and once again, Oregon comes out looking pretty good.  The Tax Foundation considers Oregon to be the 13th best in the country, an improvement of two spots from its 2011 ranking.


According to their metrics, Oregon does particularly well in sales tax and property tax, but a little worse in in corporate, individual and unemployment insurance taxes.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Going Worldwide: The OEB in 64 Languages!

I have, for all of my international groupies, added the Google Translate widget to my blogs.  Now you can read me in Portuguese, Mandarin, Swahili and the ever-popular Welsh!  Welsh really is the coolest - although if you like different scripts, check out Hindi and Arabic.  Now my fame shall know no bounds!

-or-

Nawr bydd fy enwogrwydd yn gwybod dim ffiniau!

IMF Predicts Recession in Europe This Year Will Slow Global Recovery

Trouble for the world economy. The IMF has lowered its global growth prediction to account for continuing weakness in Europe. They now predict that Europe will return to recession this year and that this contraction will put the brakes on world economic growth:

The IMF chopped its 2012 forecast for global growth to 3.3 percent from 4 percent just three months ago, saying the outlook had deteriorated in most regions. It projected world growth would strengthen to 3.9 percent in 2013.

The Washington-based lender said economic activity was decelerating but not collapsing. However, it warned that global growth would come in about 2 percentage points below its already soft forecast if European leaders allowed the crisis to fester.

For the first time since the debt turmoil erupted two years ago, the IMF said the 17-nation euro zone would likely slip into a mild recession in 2012, with output contracting by about 0.5 percent.

I am now guardedly optimistic about the US recovery - I have no illusions of robust growth but I think we have started the long slow climb out of the humongous hole we have dug - but the persistent headwinds blowing across the Atlantic will slow us down further and headway will be hard to make.

Interestingly, the IMF also cautions countries that are pursuing austerity measures to do so with moderation:

[The IMF] also called on governments to avoid imposing drastic spending cuts on already sickly economies. Fiscal tightening is necessary to correct the hefty debt burden left from the boom years, the IMF said, but it, "should ideally occur at a pace that supports adequate growth in output and employment".

"Countries with enough fiscal space, including some in the euro area, should reconsider the pace of near-term adjustment," it added, in a suggestion that will be widely viewed as aimed at Germany, which is pressing ahead with austerity measures despite its healthy budget position.

Monday, January 23, 2012

Child Well-Being in Oregon


The Foundation for Child Development and the Annie E. Casey Foundation have compiled a host of measures of child well-being and use them to rank states.  They have produced a report about these metrics, but here is their map showing the relative position of states according to their metrics.  Nancy Folbre has an interesting discussion of these at The New York Times' Economix blog as well which centers on the willingness of states' residents to pay taxes for services for children.

Oregon ranks 31st in this - slightly below the average of the 50 states.  Interestingly, from this report using much of the same data we find that Oregon does well in health measures: infant mortality, birth weight and child and teen death rates.  Where we start to fall are in the areas of education, employment and poverty.

The metrics are shown below so you can decide how meaningful they are.


Friday, January 20, 2012

Your Friday Afternoon Moment of Zen

Austerity and Growth

Recently we have seen too very different approached to the recession: big government stimulus efforts versus sharp austerity measures.  Rober Shiller weighs in on the evidence for austerity:

Jaime Guajardo, Daniel Leigh, and Andrea Pescatori of the International Monetary Fund recently studied austerity plans implemented by governments in 17 countries in the last 30 years. But their approach differed from that of previous researchers. They focused on the government’s intent, and looked at what officials actually said, not just at the pattern of public debt. They read budget speeches, reviewed stability programs, and even watched news interviews with government figures. They identified as austerity plans only those cases in which governments imposed tax hikes or spending cuts because they viewed it as a prudent policy with potential long-term benefits, not because they were responding to the short-term economic outlook and sought to reduce the risk of overheating.

Their analysis found a clear tendency for austerity programs to reduce consumption expenditure and weaken the economy. That conclusion, if valid, stands as a stern warning to policymakers today.

But critics, such as Valerie Ramey of the University of California at San Diego, think that Guajardo, Leigh, and Pescatori have not completely proven their case. It is possible, Ramey argues, that their results could reflect a different sort of reverse causality if governments are more likely to respond to high public-debt levels with austerity programs when they have reason to believe that economic conditions could make the debt burden especially worrisome.

That may seem unlikely – one would think that a bad economic outlook would incline governments to postpone, rather than accelerate, austerity measures. And, in response to her comments, the authors did try to account for the severity of the government’s debt problem as perceived by the markets at the time that the plans were implemented, finding very similar results. But Ramey could be right. One would then find that government spending cuts or tax hikes tend to be followed by bad economic times, even if the causality runs the other way.
Another potential problem for such analysis is controlling for market perceptions of the governance and reliability of countries - if they can be trusted to meet their debt obligations.  In other words is it more important for Greece to show that it has its fiscal house in order than it is for the UK?  In my opinion, yes it is.  I worry about skimping on investments in education, for example, catching up with countries 10 to 20 years down the road.  The causal link will never be completely evident, but could be very important.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Picture of the Day: De-leveraging

From the Economist:


As the Economist notes, a significant part of US household de-leveraging is due to mortgage default:

These transatlantic differences stem from the trajectory of private debt. Government borrowing soared everywhere after 2008 as government deficits ballooned. But in America the swelling of the public balance-sheet has mirrored a shrinking of private ones. Every category of private debt—financial, corporate and household—has fallen as a share of GDP since 2008. The financial sector’s debt is now at its 2000 level. Corporate indebtedness, never very high, has shrunk. So, more importantly, has household debt. America’s ratio of household debt to income is down by 15 percentage points from its peak in 2008, after rising by over 30 percentage points in the eight preceding years. McKinsey reckons America’s households are between a third and halfway through their debt-reduction process. They think the household-debt hangover could end by mid-2013.

Ah good, mid 2013. Remember all that crazy-talk of a lost decade? Welcome.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Oregon Unemployment Drops to 8.9% in December

Oregon added 2400 jobs and the unemployment rate dropped to 8.9% in December.  Good news, but clouds loom on the horizon...

Off to class, more thoughts later.

Wanna be a Part of the 1%? Study Economics

Catherine Rampell of the New York Times has a nice little post on what the 1% majored in.  A little surprising to me is how big a percentage are economics majors.  But this is undergraduate degrees and lots of econ majors go into business, finance, law, etc.  Still the market has spoken about the utility and value of economics training (let the snark fest begin)!  Here is Rampell's table.:


Undergraduate DegreeTotal% Who Are 1 PercentersShare of All 1 Percenters
Health and Medical Preparatory Programs142,34511.8%0.9%
Economics1,237,8638.2%5.4%
Biochemical Sciences193,7697.2%0.7%
Zoology159,9356.9%0.6%
Biology1,864,6666.7%6.6%
International Relations146,7816.7%0.5%
Political Science and Government1,427,2246.2%4.7%
Physiology98,1816.0%0.3%
Art History and Criticism137,3575.9%0.4%
Chemistry780,7835.7%2.4%
Molecular Biology64,9515.6%0.2%
Area, Ethnic and Civilization Studies184,9065.2%0.5%
Finance1,071,8124.8%2.7%
History1,351,3684.7%3.3%
Business Economics108,1464.6%0.3%
Miscellaneous Psychology61,2574.3%0.1%
Philosophy and Religious Studies448,0954.3%1.0%
Microbiology147,9544.2%0.3%
Chemical Engineering347,9594.1%0.8%
Physics346,4554.1%0.7%
Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Administration334,0163.9%0.7%
Accounting2,296,6013.9%4.7%
Mathematics840,1373.9%1.7%
English Language and Literature1,938,9883.8%3.8%
Miscellaneous Biology52,8953.7%0.1%

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Krueger on Income Inequality and Mobility

Alan Krueger, the current Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisors gave a speech at the Center for American Progress recently entitled "The Rise and Consequences of Inequality in the United States."  Krueger, the Princeton economics professor knows a lot about what he speaks having himself done a lot of seminal work in labor economics.  Here is the text of the speechHere are the charts that go along with the speech.

There are a number of interesting charts - familiar to those who keep tabs on this stuff, but of interest to those who don't - here are two that I thought were particularly instructive.

The first examines the correlation between income inequality and intergenerational earnings mobility and finds that the US is high in terms of inequality and low in terms of mobility (a high elasticity means that incomes are closely related across generations).


The second is the relative inequality (high) and how the US tax code addresses the inequality (less progressive) than a number of other comparison countries.  Germany, for example, has higher pre-tax inequality (blue) than the US, but much lower post-tax inequality (red) than the US.  



Germany's economy, by the way, has been the real superstar of this current economic downturn.