The New York Times reports:
As demand rose after the last two recessions, in the early 1990s and in 2001, employers moved more quickly. They added temps for only two or three months before stepping up the hiring of permanent workers. Now temp hiring has risen for four months, the economy is growing, and still corporate managers have been reluctant to shift to hiring permanent workers, relying instead on temps and other casual labor easily shed if demand slows again.
“When a job comes open now, our members fill it with a temp, or they extend a part-timer’s hours, or they bring in a freelancer — and then they wait to see what will happen next,” said William J. Dennis Jr., director of research for the National Federation of Independent Business.
The rising employment of temp workers is not all bad. However uncertain their status, they do count in government statistics as wage-earning workers, adding to the employment rolls and helping to bring down the monthly job loss to just 11,000 in November. Indeed, the unemployment rate fell in 36 states in November, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported last week, partly because of the growing use of temps.
The bureau, which issues the monthly employment reports, does not distinguish between permanent and casual employment, with one exception: it has a special category for temp workers, the men and women supplied by Manpower, Kelly Services, Adecco and other agencies.
Last month 52,000 temps were added, greater than the number of new workers in any other category. Not even health care and government, stalwarts through the long recession, did better.
1 comment:
The problem is these are low paying jobs. They are not skilled labor. My company for example plans to leave Oregon when it hits a certain profit level. The taxes I will be paying in Oregon and saving in Nevada will be enough to hire 3 people and purchase an operating facility. That's not greed, that's just plain intelligence, you would do the same. That's for a small company making less than 500K. Imagine what that means for multi-billion dollar companies. We have no jobs because we have too much government spending. Keep voting those taxes in folks and wonder whey the middle class is diminishing. You cannot tax the economy of Oregon on gross revenue as presented in these measures and not expect a severe economic backlash.
Post a Comment