Anyway, as a development economist, I know that one of the seemingly inexorable trends is urbanization. This makes sense, as a low-income economy develops, what starts as a largely rural agrarian society characterized by small farms for self-consumption and local market exchange becomes more advanced, more mechanized and more industrial. Industry requires scale and concentration and thus more and more people start to locate together. What is less obvious, perhaps, is all of the ancillary benefits to this congregation: the efficient provision of goods and services, the knowledge economies or clusters (which to an economist is just positive externalities) and so on. So prosperity and density go hand in hand.
Even within the US this trend can be seen:
We move about more efficiently and we use energy more efficiently when we live more closely together. Luckily the economics of the thing are working in our favor - the incentives associated with living densely are getting stronger and stronger.
1 comment:
This is the odd paradox of urban relocation: it's greener than country living.
Post a Comment